Download PDFOpen PDF in browserComparative Study of Teaching Methods in Russian and English Lannguage InstructionEasyChair Preprint 1459414 pages•Date: August 29, 2024AbstractThis study explores the comparative effectiveness of teaching methods in Russian and English language instruction, focusing on pedagogical approaches in both linguistic contexts. The research examines traditional and contemporary methods, such as grammar-translation, communicative language teaching (CLT), and task-based learning (TBL), evaluating their impact on language acquisition, student engagement, and proficiency outcomes.
In the Russian context, where the grammar-translation method has historically dominated, the study investigates how the integration of CLT and TBL strategies influences learners' communicative competence and overall language fluency. Conversely, in English language instruction, which has seen a broader adoption of communicative approaches, the research assesses the effectiveness of these methods in comparison to more structured, grammar-focused techniques, particularly in non-native settings.
The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative assessments of language proficiency with qualitative insights from student and teacher feedback. Data was collected from diverse educational settings, including secondary schools and language institutes in Russia and English-speaking countries. The findings highlight the strengths and limitations of each teaching method, revealing significant differences in their effectiveness depending on the linguistic and cultural context.
The study concludes with recommendations for educators, suggesting a hybrid approach that leverages the strengths of both traditional and modern methodologies to enhance language learning outcomes. This comparative analysis contributes to the ongoing discourse on language pedagogy, offering valuable insights for teachers and curriculum developers in both Russian and English language instruction. Keyphrases: Hybrid teaching approaches, Language learning outcomes, comparative analysis, language assessment, language proficiency, student engagement
|