Download PDFOpen PDF in browser

Task Interruption in Software Development Projects: What Makes some Interruptions More Disruptive than Others?

EasyChair Preprint 110

12 pagesDate: May 1, 2018

Abstract

Multitasking has always been an inherent part of software development and is known as the primary source of interruptions due to task switching in software development teams. Developing software involves a mix of analytical and creative work, and requires a significant load on brain functions, such as working memory and decision making. Thus, task switching in the context of software development imposes a cognitive load that causes software developers to lose focus and concentration while working thereby taking a toll on productivity. To investigate the disruptiveness of task switching and interruptions in software development projects, and to understand the reasons for and perceptions of the disruptiveness of task switching we used a mixed-methods approach including a longitudinal data analysis on 4,910 recorded tasks of 17 professional software developers, and a survey of 132 software developers. We found that, compared to task-specific factors (e.g. priority, level, and temporal stage), contextual factors such as interruption type (e.g. self/external), time of day, and task type and context are a more potent determinant of task switching disruptiveness in software development tasks. Furthermore, while most survey respondents believe external interruptions are more disruptive than self-interruptions, the results of our retrospective analysis reveals otherwise. We found that self-interruptions (i.e. voluntary task switchings) are more disruptive than external interruptions and have a negative effect on the performance of the interrupted tasks. Finally, we use the results of both studies to provide a set of comparative vulnerability and interaction patterns which can be used as a mean to guide decision-making and forecasting the consequences of task switching in software development teams.

Keyphrases: Context Switching, Productivity, Software Engineering, data analysis, developer productivity, empirical study, multitasking, retrospective analysis, software development, task interruption, task switching

BibTeX entry
BibTeX does not have the right entry for preprints. This is a hack for producing the correct reference:
@booklet{EasyChair:110,
  author    = {Zahra Shakeri Hossein Abad and Oliver Karras and Kurt Schneider and Ken Barker and Mike Bauer},
  title     = {Task Interruption in Software Development Projects: What Makes some Interruptions More Disruptive than Others?},
  doi       = {10.29007/464w},
  howpublished = {EasyChair Preprint 110},
  year      = {EasyChair, 2018}}
Download PDFOpen PDF in browser